Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
