Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X
