Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX
