Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a maximum drag of 5kg / 11,02lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
