Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity

Spinning

84.90 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.63 out of 10

Ergonomics6.33 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight200g / 7.05oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings11

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €484.00
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

84.40 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.35 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight195g / 6.88oz

Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500 S-XH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX offers a durability of 5.63 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (5kg / 11,02lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency