Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200

Shimano Sedona 500 FI
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag3kg / 7 lbs
Weight180g / 6.3oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX clearly outshines Shimano Sedona 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.49 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Shimano Sedona 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity and Shimano Sedona 500 FI?
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sedona 500 FI
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 7 lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
