Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
74.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight143g / 5.04oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/170
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
