Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
