Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
