Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €537.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.13/200
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 77 centimeter / 30.31 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Delphin YUPIE


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
