Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX
