Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
