Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
