Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
