Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
