Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag
