Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X
