Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX
