Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
