Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €661.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
