Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX
