Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank85 centimeter / 33.46 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €479.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (85 centimeter / 33.46 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX
- 8 out of 10 (85 centimeter / 33.46 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
