Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

78.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.63 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €189.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Penn 2020 Clash II

Spinning

75.80 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.61 out of 10

Ergonomics6.22 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs

Weight235g / 8.29oz

Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch

Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €185.20
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X and Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X offers a ball bearings of 6, while Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X stands out for a durability of 8.61 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Penn 2020 Clash II?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X

6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.