Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

78.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.63 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €189.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Complex XR

Spinning

83.60 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.3:1

Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €215.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/100

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X and Shimano Complex XR 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Complex XR 2500X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 78 centimeter / 30.71 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Complex XR?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Shimano Complex XR 2500X

6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques