Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Exsence
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €416.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 MHGA
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/125
Conclusion
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Exsence?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX
- 8.3 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX
