Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X offers a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
- Scoring 8.53 out of 10 (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch), this reel pulls line in fast enough to keep you in control even during unpredictable runs
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X
