Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X, offering significantly better performance in total score (7.85 out of 10) and gear ratio (5.1:1). While Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Solid value at €189.33, reliable and great performance, it’s a smart choice for a variety of spinning fishing needs
Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic FM vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
