Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

78.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.63 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €189.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Sahara FJ

Spinning

65.00 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.12 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight265g / 9.35oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €63.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC 3000 DH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X edges out Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the total score (7.85 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 7 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Sahara FJ?

Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.