Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

78.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.63 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €189.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Sedona FJ

Spinning

63.90 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics6.18 out of 10

Gear ratio5.0:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight245g / 8.64oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings3+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €52.33
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000FJ
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X edges out Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the total score (7.85 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 7 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Sedona FJ?

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.