Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 120/0.16
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Delphin INKS 2000X
