Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
93.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €593.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 160/0.16
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 2500X edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Stella FK 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
