Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Stella FK
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings12+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/0.13
Conclusion
Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch) and the durability (9.5 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Stella FK?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
