Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €409.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Conclusion
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
