Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X edges out Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch and a durability of 5.56 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X
