Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch and a durability of 5.57 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X
