Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
73.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €369.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/260
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X and Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.29 out of 10 (72 centimeter / 28.35 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
