Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Twin Power XD A
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €359.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Twin Power XD A?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
