Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

78.50 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.63 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €189.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Vanford FA

Spinning

70.00 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.65 out of 10

Ergonomics6.38 out of 10

Gear ratio5.1:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight185g / 6.53oz

Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch

Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €195.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000SDHA
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X and Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X offers a ball bearings of 6, while Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Vanford FA?

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X

Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX

When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles