Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:8
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000MHGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/85
Conclusion
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
