Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
78.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €189.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and total score (7.85 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX
