Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X
