Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT, 2500-XH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10610-255
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €179.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 4000-C, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-405
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €69.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX, offering significantly better performance in total score (8.94 out of 10) and gear ratio (6.2:1). While Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables