Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X
