Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Battle III 3000X

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT

Spinning

89.40 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.6 out of 10

Ergonomics6.35 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs

Weight195g / 6.88oz

Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €179.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2500-XH
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Battle III

Spinning

72.80 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classMedium

Durability7.73 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs

Weight330g / 11.64oz

Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €96.10
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180

Conclusion

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX edges out Penn Battle III 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (195g / 6,88oz) and the ergonomics (6.35 out of 10). Still, Penn Battle III 3000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 7.73 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 89 centimeter / 35.04 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.