Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
