Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L
