Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX edges out Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the weight (195g / 6,88oz). Still, Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.73 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
