Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
89.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a durability of 5.89 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X
