Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.54 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight138g / 4.87oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.17/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX and Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX
