Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 19 Certate
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 19 Certate?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX
