Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X
