Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX
