Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX edges out Penn Battle III 8000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (195g / 6,88oz) and the line retrieve per crank (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch). Still, Penn Battle III 8000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
