Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the weight (195g / 6,88oz). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
