Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
82.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €179.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano 20 Stella
Spinning
92.30 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight415g / 14.64oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €667.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX edges out Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). Still, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 195g / 6,88oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT and Shimano 20 Stella?
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona 500 FI vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI
